Many of the “Black Lives Matter” protests were peaceful, but in some large cities, these demonstrators have been taken over by anarchists and Antifa activists who have used violence against innocent bystanders and especially against the police.
These anarchists are mostly Left wing, and Antifa, despite its name, is a fascist organization. I believe it has also been called a terrorist organization by the Justice Department. (Verified, check out this link: https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/attorney-general-william-p-barrs-statement-riots-and-domestic-terrorism).
Most people on the Right do not protest. It just isn’t in the DNA of most Conservatives. We prefer to do our own thing and be left alone by government, and we are not demonstrating for more government services and support like the Left does. We tend to be more self-sufficient.
So it may be news when a Right-wing group of protesters clashes with a larger Left-wing group, but today’s article only identifies the “Far-Right” protesters in Portland and counts them at 30. This is compared to hundreds of Left-wing thugs who are injuring officers, lighting fires, destroying property, etc. The article never identifies who is behind most of the violent protests, beating, and looting.
The Boston Globe seems deathly afraid of calling out the fascist thugs that are ruining our cities and demoralizing our police officers with their lies about our “justice system” being “racist, front to back” (I believe I am quoting Elizabeth Warren accurately there, but all the Leftists believe this.)
This reminds me of how the Left was afraid of calling out China for allowing the Coronavirus to spread. That was racist. And how it is racist to call radical Muslim terrorists by that affiliation. Islam is a religion of peace, except when it isn’t.
Is American media blind to the Left’s violent agenda, or do they just support it so they stay quiet and downplay its Democratic Party roots? Or maybe the media is afraid that they will be targeted next by Antifa if they don’t toe the line?
(The article under discussion is at the end of the shorts in the green-box link).
Allen Nitschelm is publisher of PublicEditorMA.com. He critiques the Boston Globe, mostly focusing on the bias in their news reporting. News articles are graded for bias, and the website has a listing of the average bias ratings for all reporters reviewed. See our website for more information and the four categories of articles we publish.
NOTE: We have been very active on our Facebook page for Public Editor Press. The page is getting lots of hits and comments, which have been very helpful. I urge readers to go there if you wish to participate or read reactions from others. You will need to “login” to Facebook to post your own comments but you can probably read them without a Facebook account. Here is the direct link to this article’s Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/390560688135747/posts/910229482835529
To reach our Facebook site in general: https://www.facebook.com/publiceditorpress/
*Requires minimim of 5 Ratings to be displayed
Grading articles for bias is subjective. We hope that with widespread participation, we can give the reporters and editors at the Boston Globe valuable feedback on their professional work. Here are our suggestions for grading news articles for bias. (We do not rate editorial opinion columns for bias. But we do analyze the Boston Globe for overall editorial balance.)
Consider whether the article is completely free of bias (a grade of 10 or A), has been mostly free of bias (8 or 9, A- or B+), has been biased but not terribly or where the bias did not hurt the integrity of the underlying information (7 or 6, B or B-).
If the article was fairly biased overall, but subtle; or where the bias was particularly prominent but isolated to a single section, give the article a 5 or 4 (C+ or C). If the article was very biased but perhaps not intentionally so, perhaps a C- (3) would be deserved.
If the article was extremely prejudiced with major misstatements of fact, intentionally misleading, or ignored well known facts to advance a false narrative, give the article a D or F (2 or 1).
Reviewers must subscribe to Public Editor and agree to our terms of service to participate. Subscriptions are currently free. We recommend that all readers subscribe to the Boston Globe or the newspaper of their choice to support journalism, and to send the Boston Globe your feedback directly. Thank you for participating in Public Editor’s bias rating project!