[Post Warren Report # 67-2020]
Some people—or organizations—don’t know when to quit.
Take the Boston Globe, whose top story in the Sunday Globe was about…Elizabeth Warren. They need to give up this fascination with this woman, yet they persist.
You remember Warren, right? She was the also-ran Democrat candidate for President who never really gained traction after her frequent lies about her background were exposed, and who dropped out of the primary last Thursday having won zero states. She won a handful of delegates by a couple of third-place finishes because the Democrats like to apportion delegates to all who get above 15%, their version of a trophy for every participant like is done on kids’ soccer fields.
But the breaking headline news in the Sunday Boston Globe is another tedious article about the Native Daughter? What, has the coronavirus subsided? I guess no news is good news if this is the lead story.
Haven’t the Globe readers been humiliated enough by this paper’s pandering and biased coverage of the Warren campaign? Apparently not. Readers are just thirsting for more “behind-the-scenes” details. Unfortunately, Bailey was not the subject of this article.
Who decided to run the cemetery plot below the Warren story (see photo two)? That, at least, was brilliant.
Allen Nitschelm is publisher of PublicEditorMA.com. He critiques the Boston Globe, mostly focusing on the bias in their news reporting. News articles are graded for bias, and the website has a listing of the average bias ratings for all reporters reviewed. See our website for more information and the four categories of articles we publish.
NOTE: We have been very active on our Facebook page for Public Editor Press. The page is getting lots of hits and comments, which have been very helpful. I urge readers to go there if you wish to participate or read reactions from others. You will need to “login” to Facebook to post your own comments but you can probably read them without a Facebook account. Here is the direct link to this article’s Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/390560688135747/posts/797648230760322
To reach our Facebook site in general: https://www.facebook.com/publiceditorpress/
*Requires minimim of 5 Ratings to be displayed
Grading articles for bias is subjective. We hope that with widespread participation, we can give the reporters and editors at the Boston Globe valuable feedback on their professional work. Here are our suggestions for grading news articles for bias. (We do not rate editorial opinion columns for bias. But we do analyze the Boston Globe for overall editorial balance.)
Consider whether the article is completely free of bias (a grade of 10 or A), has been mostly free of bias (8 or 9, A- or B+), has been biased but not terribly or where the bias did not hurt the integrity of the underlying information (7 or 6, B or B-).
If the article was fairly biased overall, but subtle; or where the bias was particularly prominent but isolated to a single section, give the article a 5 or 4 (C+ or C). If the article was very biased but perhaps not intentionally so, perhaps a C- (3) would be deserved.
If the article was extremely prejudiced with major misstatements of fact, intentionally misleading, or ignored well known facts to advance a false narrative, give the article a D or F (2 or 1).
Reviewers must subscribe to Public Editor and agree to our terms of service to participate. Subscriptions are currently free. We recommend that all readers subscribe to the Boston Globe or the newspaper of their choice to support journalism, and to send the Boston Globe your feedback directly. Thank you for participating in Public Editor’s bias rating project!