Minority voters are more likely to support Democratic nominee Joe Biden, on average, than Republican President Donald Trump. This is less about Trump personally and more about well-established voting patterns that go back decades. For that long, the media has favored the political Left and that indoctrination has helped skew our electorate. The narrative used to be that Republicans were for rich, country-club types, and now it is that Republicans are racist or anti-immigrant.
The Globe reports on a recent poll of Indian-Americans which shows that 72% of such voters support the Biden-Harris ticket. The angle of this story is that Kamala Harris is partly of Indian descent:
While Indian Americans hold a wide variety of political views, the presence on the Democratic ticket of Harris, whose mother immigrated from Chennai, India, has had a galvanizing effect on a voting bloc that could help Biden in battleground states like Pennsylvania, Florida, and Michigan.
Would you characterize a drop in support as “galvanizing” the voting bloc?
Because in 2016, Hillary Clinton won 77% of the Indian-American vote, according to press reports. (See phone four, and https://www.indiaabroad.com/indian-americans/2016-election-saw-groundbreaking-asian-american-vote/article_f499318e-3f3e-11e7-9064-5f190aac86ca.html).
An unbiased article would note that despite the presence of someone with an Indian-American background, Biden’s support has dropped five points among Indian-Americans.
More “fake news” from the Socialist Media Establishment and our local affiliate, the Boston Globe.
Allen Nitschelm is publisher of PublicEditorMA.com. He critiques the Boston Globe, mostly focusing on the bias in their news reporting. News articles are graded for bias, and the website has a listing of the average bias ratings for all reporters reviewed. See our website for more information and the four categories of articles we publish.
NOTE: We have been very active on our Facebook page for Public Editor Press. The page is getting lots of hits and comments, which have been very helpful. I urge readers to go there if you wish to participate or read reactions from others. You will need to “login” to Facebook to post your own comments but you can probably read them without a Facebook account. Here is the direct link to this article’s Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/390560688135747/posts/956981111493699
To reach our Facebook site in general: https://www.facebook.com/publiceditorpress/
*Requires minimim of 5 Ratings to be displayed
Grading articles for bias is subjective. We hope that with widespread participation, we can give the reporters and editors at the Boston Globe valuable feedback on their professional work. Here are our suggestions for grading news articles for bias. (We do not rate editorial opinion columns for bias. But we do analyze the Boston Globe for overall editorial balance.)
Consider whether the article is completely free of bias (a grade of 10 or A), has been mostly free of bias (8 or 9, A- or B+), has been biased but not terribly or where the bias did not hurt the integrity of the underlying information (7 or 6, B or B-).
If the article was fairly biased overall, but subtle; or where the bias was particularly prominent but isolated to a single section, give the article a 5 or 4 (C+ or C). If the article was very biased but perhaps not intentionally so, perhaps a C- (3) would be deserved.
If the article was extremely prejudiced with major misstatements of fact, intentionally misleading, or ignored well known facts to advance a false narrative, give the article a D or F (2 or 1).
Reviewers must subscribe to Public Editor and agree to our terms of service to participate. Subscriptions are currently free. We recommend that all readers subscribe to the Boston Globe or the newspaper of their choice to support journalism, and to send the Boston Globe your feedback directly. Thank you for participating in Public Editor’s bias rating project!