Colorado Prairie dogs contract The Plague from homeless in LA

Colorado Prairie dogs contract The Plague from homeless in LA

PE Bias Grade : N/A

By: Allen Nitschelm on August 19, 2019 | Investigative Journalism

This is a review of the following Boston Globe Article:
Article Title Colo. faces plague-infested prairie dogs
Date 08/19/2019
Article Link Boston Globe ( Page A2 )
Syndicated From Washington Post
Journalist Morgan Krakow
Article Summary

Prairie dogs develop plague from visiting Los Angeles homeless.

Share This Story

Public Editor MA, through diligent research and “connecting the dots,” has discovered that The Plague epidemic hitting the prairie dog population in Colorado was in fact contracted in downtown Los Angeles, CA, by some traveling prairie dogs visiting Hollywood.

The plague, transmitted by infected ticks, were picked up from homeless human beings who are doing all of their business on the streets of LA, which has led to an explosion of health and safety concerns. The Plague killed millions of people centuries ago and occasionally is contracted by a few U.S. citizens, as well as mice, rodents, and prairie dogs. The p-dogs’ trip to California was uncovered by subpoenaing Uber records.

Today’s article did offer some good news. The concert by the band Phish will go on as scheduled, despite performing next to the fields where the infected prairie dogs live. “Phish will continue to play so long as everyone remains in quarantine for two weeks,” an organizer said. “This might not have been possible before the state legalized marijuana.”


There are no user ratings at the moment.

Subscriber Ratings & Comments

Please be sure you are logged in to Rate Boston Globe Articles or Post Comments.

Here is the article you are rating for journalistic bias: Colo. faces plague-infested prairie dogs

Rating scale in brief: 10 = A (No Bias) | 1 = F (Extreme Bias). For more details, please read Tips & Instructions below.

Please wait...

*Requires minimim of 5 Ratings to be displayed

Leave A Comment

Grading articles for bias is subjective. We hope that with widespread participation, we can give the reporters and editors at the Boston Globe valuable feedback on their professional work. Here are our suggestions for grading news articles for bias. (We do not rate editorial opinion columns for bias. But we do analyze the Boston Globe for overall editorial balance.)

Consider whether the article is completely free of bias (a grade of 10 or A), has been mostly free of bias (8 or 9, A- or B+), has been biased but not terribly or where the bias did not hurt the integrity of the underlying information (7 or 6, B or B-).

If the article was fairly biased overall, but subtle; or where the bias was particularly prominent but isolated to a single section, give the article a 5 or 4 (C+ or C). If the article was very biased but perhaps not intentionally so, perhaps a C- (3) would be deserved.

If the article was extremely prejudiced with major misstatements of fact, intentionally misleading, or ignored well known facts to advance a false narrative, give the article a D or F (2 or 1).

Reviewers must subscribe to Public Editor and agree to our terms of service to participate. Subscriptions are currently free. We recommend that all readers subscribe to the Boston Globe or the newspaper of their choice to support journalism, and to send the Boston Globe your feedback directly. Thank you for participating in Public Editor’s bias rating project!

Leave A Comment