[Warren Report #60-2020]
The Warren supporters just don’t understand why Warren’s giveaway plans are not resonating with poor, black voters. Don’t they want free stuff?
Well, when the entire candidate field is giving away free stuff, it becomes a bidding war. And in that war, Bernie has deeper pockets than Liz. When Bernie promises free stuff, you know he believes it and will do whatever he can to deliver. Warren, however, speaks with forked tongue.
Joe Biden has a different connection to Black voters. And though he isn’t a socialist, he has moved to the Left for the primary. So he has promised to raise spending by trillions, not tens of trillions.
One voter quoted in this article sums up his ambivalence with Warren, and it boils down to her likability factor. He can’t quite put his finger on the problem with Warren, but something bothers him. Maybe he just needs to sit down and have a beer with her.
Like most Warren Report articles, this one relies heavily on declared Warren supporters to proclaim her wonderfulness while most Democrat primary voters have already passed her by. The countdown to the end of the Warren Report series has started.
Allen Nitschelm is publisher of PublicEditorMA.com. He critiques the Boston Globe, mostly focusing on the bias in their news reporting. News articles are graded for bias, and the website has a listing of the average bias ratings for all reporters reviewed. See our website for more information and the four categories of articles we publish.
NOTE: We have been very active on our Facebook page for Public Editor Press. The page is getting lots of hits and comments, which have been very helpful. I urge readers to go there if you wish to participate or read reactions from others. You will need to “login” to Facebook to post your own comments but you can probably read them without a Facebook account. Here is the direct link to this article’s Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/390560688135747/posts/794483807743431
To reach our Facebook site in general: https://www.facebook.com/publiceditorpress/
*Requires minimim of 5 Ratings to be displayed
Grading articles for bias is subjective. We hope that with widespread participation, we can give the reporters and editors at the Boston Globe valuable feedback on their professional work. Here are our suggestions for grading news articles for bias. (We do not rate editorial opinion columns for bias. But we do analyze the Boston Globe for overall editorial balance.)
Consider whether the article is completely free of bias (a grade of 10 or A), has been mostly free of bias (8 or 9, A- or B+), has been biased but not terribly or where the bias did not hurt the integrity of the underlying information (7 or 6, B or B-).
If the article was fairly biased overall, but subtle; or where the bias was particularly prominent but isolated to a single section, give the article a 5 or 4 (C+ or C). If the article was very biased but perhaps not intentionally so, perhaps a C- (3) would be deserved.
If the article was extremely prejudiced with major misstatements of fact, intentionally misleading, or ignored well known facts to advance a false narrative, give the article a D or F (2 or 1).
Reviewers must subscribe to Public Editor and agree to our terms of service to participate. Subscriptions are currently free. We recommend that all readers subscribe to the Boston Globe or the newspaper of their choice to support journalism, and to send the Boston Globe your feedback directly. Thank you for participating in Public Editor’s bias rating project!