Why do we have experts? Perhaps to do studies such as this one, which reveals an important truth: children separated from their parents are traumatized by it.
I would never have guessed it.
The fault lies with the parents of these illegal immigrants, who are not following our country’s laws regarding immigration or asylum. Instead, they are crossing illegally, many bringing children with them as pawns so they can get quickly released. If bringing children was normal immigration movement, the surge in families wouldn’t be occurring.
But the main downgrade to this otherwise fine story is the reference to the Trump administration’s policy. Actually, this is the Obama administration’s policy, which is being carried out by the Trump administration. To blame a popular Democratic administration would not fit the evil, racist, Nazi, white supremacist, homophobic narrative that the media and their allies in the Democrat Party continue to spin in advance of the 2020 election.
Why wouldn’t the AP, as part of its push to halt this practice, find fault with the Democrats for not agreeing to meet and compromise to stop it? Notice how this is all President Trump’s fault. The alternative, to just let illegal immigrants who bring children with them out into America, is simply unacceptable. Trump has repeatedly called attention to this loophole and Nancy Pelosi and Chuck Schumer have no interest in closing it. They’d rather let the practice continue so they can campaign against Trump. You see, some things are more important than poor immigrants and their offspring.
*Requires minimim of 5 Ratings to be displayed
Grading articles for bias is subjective. We hope that with widespread participation, we can give the reporters and editors at the Boston Globe valuable feedback on their professional work. Here are our suggestions for grading news articles for bias. (We do not rate editorial opinion columns for bias. But we do analyze the Boston Globe for overall editorial balance.)
Consider whether the article is completely free of bias (a grade of 10 or A), has been mostly free of bias (8 or 9, A- or B+), has been biased but not terribly or where the bias did not hurt the integrity of the underlying information (7 or 6, B or B-).
If the article was fairly biased overall, but subtle; or where the bias was particularly prominent but isolated to a single section, give the article a 5 or 4 (C+ or C). If the article was very biased but perhaps not intentionally so, perhaps a C- (3) would be deserved.
If the article was extremely prejudiced with major misstatements of fact, intentionally misleading, or ignored well known facts to advance a false narrative, give the article a D or F (2 or 1).
Reviewers must subscribe to Public Editor and agree to our terms of service to participate. Subscriptions are currently free. We recommend that all readers subscribe to the Boston Globe or the newspaper of their choice to support journalism, and to send the Boston Globe your feedback directly. Thank you for participating in Public Editor’s bias rating project!