That the Boston Globe editorial board takes direction from MoveOn.org is now confirmed.
Today’s poor excuse for outrage is that Attorney General William Barr is taking a few weeks to carefully review and redact portions of the Mueller Report before releasing it to the public. That the Globe is trying to make the delay part of our partisan tapestry is idiotic. The Left is trying to turn the speed of the Report’s release into a partisan issue, and when the Report finally does get released, it will examine every redaction and wonder who is covering up what. I’m sure The Globe will work hand-in-glove with the Democrats on that as well.
The Globe opines today that it has been “14 days” since the Mueller Report was delivered to Attorney General Barr, and Barr has still not released the “complete document” yet. “It’s hard to imagine a legitimate reason for his foot-dragging.” How about — it takes time to carefully read and edit sensitive information.
If the Globe wants to see the “complete document,” it’s going to take a lot longer than 14 days because it’s never going to happen. I look forward to watching the Globe’s daily tally of how many days it’s been and to see when the Globe broadens it’s imagination.
Why hasn’t the Globe apologized for its hundreds of mischaracterizarions by its various writers over the past two or three years who alleged “without proof” that President Trump and his campaign were guilty of collusion with Russia? Maybe we need a countdown for that, too.
A better countdown might be how many years it’s been since the Boston Globe honored its profession and published bias-free reporting. Well, I’ve lost count.
*Requires minimim of 5 Ratings to be displayed
Grading articles for bias is subjective. We hope that with widespread participation, we can give the reporters and editors at the Boston Globe valuable feedback on their professional work. Here are our suggestions for grading news articles for bias. (We do not rate editorial opinion columns for bias. But we do analyze the Boston Globe for overall editorial balance.)
Consider whether the article is completely free of bias (a grade of 10 or A), has been mostly free of bias (8 or 9, A- or B+), has been biased but not terribly or where the bias did not hurt the integrity of the underlying information (7 or 6, B or B-).
If the article was fairly biased overall, but subtle; or where the bias was particularly prominent but isolated to a single section, give the article a 5 or 4 (C+ or C). If the article was very biased but perhaps not intentionally so, perhaps a C- (3) would be deserved.
If the article was extremely prejudiced with major misstatements of fact, intentionally misleading, or ignored well known facts to advance a false narrative, give the article a D or F (2 or 1).
Reviewers must subscribe to Public Editor and agree to our terms of service to participate. Subscriptions are currently free. We recommend that all readers subscribe to the Boston Globe or the newspaper of their choice to support journalism, and to send the Boston Globe your feedback directly. Thank you for participating in Public Editor’s bias rating project!