When I first open the Boston Globe app to read the day’s headlines, I never know what I will find. This morning, after the weekend release of the Mueller report’s conclusions, I was prepared for another partisan headline and article. But I was pleasantly surprised that the Globe played it straight. The Mueller Report found no collusion between anyone in the Trump campaign and the Russian government. This is full exoneration for Trump and validates his calling this a “witch hunt” for the past two years. It will be interesting to see how the media now bends over backwards to repair the damage their false, biased reporting did to President Trump.
Attorney General Barr along with Deputy Rosenstein opined that there is no case for “obstruction of justice.” The WSJ writes today that this is because President Trump has an absolute right to fire former FBI Director James Comey for any reason, so that could never be used as evidence of obstruction. But to me, the obstruction charge must also be related to there being an underlying crime. And Trump’s characterization and annoyance at the “witch hunt” was very public. He was never skulking around, trying to secretly undermine the investigation.
President Trump was found innocent of the charge of campaign collusion with Russia. Had the reverse happened, our country would be in bad shape. It would have been some type of Constitutional crisis. The secrecy during the probe increased everyone’s anxiety even as Trump steadfastly denied the charge. Both the innocent and guilty always deny the charges. The media still has an obligation to keep the presumption of innocence which they certainly failed to do in this instance, egged on by partisan Democrats who continued to insist that they had seen the secret evidence of collusion. So everyone was prepared for something, but not a full exoneration.
Well, kudos to the Globe for its coverage today. Now let’s see if this helps them turn over a new leaf in their coverage of Donald Trump and Republicans.
*Requires minimim of 5 Ratings to be displayed
Grading articles for bias is subjective. We hope that with widespread participation, we can give the reporters and editors at the Boston Globe valuable feedback on their professional work. Here are our suggestions for grading news articles for bias. (We do not rate editorial opinion columns for bias. But we do analyze the Boston Globe for overall editorial balance.)
Consider whether the article is completely free of bias (a grade of 10 or A), has been mostly free of bias (8 or 9, A- or B+), has been biased but not terribly or where the bias did not hurt the integrity of the underlying information (7 or 6, B or B-).
If the article was fairly biased overall, but subtle; or where the bias was particularly prominent but isolated to a single section, give the article a 5 or 4 (C+ or C). If the article was very biased but perhaps not intentionally so, perhaps a C- (3) would be deserved.
If the article was extremely prejudiced with major misstatements of fact, intentionally misleading, or ignored well known facts to advance a false narrative, give the article a D or F (2 or 1).
Reviewers must subscribe to Public Editor and agree to our terms of service to participate. Subscriptions are currently free. We recommend that all readers subscribe to the Boston Globe or the newspaper of their choice to support journalism, and to send the Boston Globe your feedback directly. Thank you for participating in Public Editor’s bias rating project!