False cause and effect

False cause and effect

PE Bias Grade : C-

By: Allen Nitschelm on August 27, 2019 | Article Review

This is a review of the following Boston Globe Article:
Article Title Data show citizenship boosts immigrants
Date 08/20/2019
Article Link Boston Globe ( Page A2 )
Syndicated From Associated Press
Journalist Mike Schneider
Article Summary

Globe tries to assert causation between citizenship and success in America.

Share This Story

Many immigrants come here with the hope of becoming a citizen. Those who are successful, by and large, appear to share in the American Dream. That is what the census study found.

The Globe reports this as an indictment of Donald Trump because he is trying to deny illegal immigrants access to the country. If we would just let them come in and become citizens, look how successful they would be! When immigrants do not become citizens, they have higher poverty, lower education levels, etc.

So this narrative presents a false cause and effect. It makes readers think that citizenship is causing this success. If we just let illegal aliens become citizens too, they would be just as successful.

The headline is incorrect. “Citizenship” does not boost immigrants. Immigrants who become citizens tend to be well educated and successful. People who come here and are on a citizenship track do well and when they achieve their goal, they are as successful as other Americans, on average. So the statistics support legal immigration…but that isn’t the headline, of course.

The article also says the Trump administration is trying to “stop the flow of immigrants”. That is not true. Trump is trying to stop illegal immigration and to end things like chain migration and the visa lottery. Since the Democrats will not negotiate any changes to our immigration policies, we can’t say what Trump would propose in its place, but he has said repeatedly that he favors legal immigration and with our low unemployment numbers, we need more workers. But this common Trump smear is meant to paint him as an opponent of all immigrants–i.e., he is against “people of color” and is xenophobic.

The fact that illegal immigrants have to live in the shadows, in fear of deportation, unable (in theory) to get a job or get welfare benefits, should make the writer conclude that maybe coming here illegally is not such a great idea. Maybe encouraging illegal entry is exploitative and dangerous. Maybe using the sad story of illegal immigration to paint President Trump as xenophobic and cruel is not worth the political goal of his opponents or the suffering of the illegals who are being exploited by the Left to further their goals.

 

Author Rating

Rating: 3.0/10.

Description

There are no user ratings at the moment.

Subscriber Ratings & Comments

Please be sure you are logged in to Rate Boston Globe Articles or Post Comments.

Here is the article you are rating for journalistic bias: Data show citizenship boosts immigrants

Rating scale in brief: 10 = A (No Bias) | 1 = F (Extreme Bias). For more details, please read Tips & Instructions below.

Please wait...

*Requires minimim of 5 Ratings to be displayed

Leave A Comment

Grading articles for bias is subjective. We hope that with widespread participation, we can give the reporters and editors at the Boston Globe valuable feedback on their professional work. Here are our suggestions for grading news articles for bias. (We do not rate editorial opinion columns for bias. But we do analyze the Boston Globe for overall editorial balance.)

Consider whether the article is completely free of bias (a grade of 10 or A), has been mostly free of bias (8 or 9, A- or B+), has been biased but not terribly or where the bias did not hurt the integrity of the underlying information (7 or 6, B or B-).

If the article was fairly biased overall, but subtle; or where the bias was particularly prominent but isolated to a single section, give the article a 5 or 4 (C+ or C). If the article was very biased but perhaps not intentionally so, perhaps a C- (3) would be deserved.

If the article was extremely prejudiced with major misstatements of fact, intentionally misleading, or ignored well known facts to advance a false narrative, give the article a D or F (2 or 1).

Reviewers must subscribe to Public Editor and agree to our terms of service to participate. Subscriptions are currently free. We recommend that all readers subscribe to the Boston Globe or the newspaper of their choice to support journalism, and to send the Boston Globe your feedback directly. Thank you for participating in Public Editor’s bias rating project!

Leave A Comment

Subject

Rating: 3.0/10.

Description