The Boston Globe runs another piece on the migrant crisis, this time quoting two Democrat leaders admitting it is a crisis. No irony there, despite a government shutdown that the media pinned on President Trump. Besides winning, he must be getting tired of being proven right. Well, he did say we all might get tired of winning.
Trump’s threat to close the southern border is meant to force Mexico to take stronger action to deter the flood of migrants. Most of these would-be immigrants are economic refugees who are looking for a better life in America. Isn’t that the story for most legal immigrants too? But these Central Americans have figured out a loophole, probably through coaching by Democrat-paid immigration lawyers, that by claiming “asylum,” they will likely be released into the U.S. These are not “asylum seekers,” they are scam artists seeking to walk through the loophole.
On top of that, you have the child-trafficking issue, the sexual abuse of women, the drugs being smuggled, and the danger of having so many people living in the United States “under the radar,” constantly afraid of being discovered and deported. This is no way to live and it isn’t humane to encourage these migrants, and especially not to take such a dangerous trip with children. Illegal immigrants are not supposed to have jobs, so how will they support themselves? It is crazy that the Democrats and the media like the Globe are supporting the current dysfunction.
Yet the Globe uncritically calls them asylum seekers. They are migrant families, many of whom are falsely claiming asylum. Most asylum claims are denied by the courts, after months or years of delay. Being an economic refugee is not helpful to one’s asylum claim. The majority of asylum claims are denied.
*Requires minimim of 5 Ratings to be displayed
Grading articles for bias is subjective. We hope that with widespread participation, we can give the reporters and editors at the Boston Globe valuable feedback on their professional work. Here are our suggestions for grading news articles for bias. (We do not rate editorial opinion columns for bias. But we do analyze the Boston Globe for overall editorial balance.)
Consider whether the article is completely free of bias (a grade of 10 or A), has been mostly free of bias (8 or 9, A- or B+), has been biased but not terribly or where the bias did not hurt the integrity of the underlying information (7 or 6, B or B-).
If the article was fairly biased overall, but subtle; or where the bias was particularly prominent but isolated to a single section, give the article a 5 or 4 (C+ or C). If the article was very biased but perhaps not intentionally so, perhaps a C- (3) would be deserved.
If the article was extremely prejudiced with major misstatements of fact, intentionally misleading, or ignored well known facts to advance a false narrative, give the article a D or F (2 or 1).
Reviewers must subscribe to Public Editor and agree to our terms of service to participate. Subscriptions are currently free. We recommend that all readers subscribe to the Boston Globe or the newspaper of their choice to support journalism, and to send the Boston Globe your feedback directly. Thank you for participating in Public Editor’s bias rating project!