Only one way to go

Only one way to go

PE Bias Grade : A

By: Allen Nitschelm on August 12, 2019 | Article Review

This is a review of the following Boston Globe Article:
Article Title Moulton says he's still in running
Date 08/11/2019
Article Link N/A
Syndicated From N/A
Journalist James Pindell
Article Summary

Update on the flailing Presidential candidacy of Congressman Seth Moulton.

Share This Story

Who says politics is humorless?

I can’t tell if the Boston Globe is trying to be funny or is just so committed to the Democrat Party as it continues to write apparently serious articles about Congressman Seth Moulton, who is allegedly running for president.

Here’s a quote from today’s piece on page B1: “Still, Moulton is unique in that he has had zero support in every qualifying poll for the debates since he entered the race in April.”

I guess Moulton is truly unique. He is the only candidate in the busy field of 25 who can only move up.

 

Author Rating

Rating: 10.0/10.

Description

There are no user ratings at the moment.

Subscriber Ratings & Comments

Please be sure you are logged in to Rate Boston Globe Articles or Post Comments.

Here is the article you are rating for journalistic bias: Moulton says he's still in running

Rating scale in brief: 10 = A (No Bias) | 1 = F (Extreme Bias). For more details, please read Tips & Instructions below.

Please wait...

*Requires minimim of 5 Ratings to be displayed

Leave A Comment

Grading articles for bias is subjective. We hope that with widespread participation, we can give the reporters and editors at the Boston Globe valuable feedback on their professional work. Here are our suggestions for grading news articles for bias. (We do not rate editorial opinion columns for bias. But we do analyze the Boston Globe for overall editorial balance.)

Consider whether the article is completely free of bias (a grade of 10 or A), has been mostly free of bias (8 or 9, A- or B+), has been biased but not terribly or where the bias did not hurt the integrity of the underlying information (7 or 6, B or B-).

If the article was fairly biased overall, but subtle; or where the bias was particularly prominent but isolated to a single section, give the article a 5 or 4 (C+ or C). If the article was very biased but perhaps not intentionally so, perhaps a C- (3) would be deserved.

If the article was extremely prejudiced with major misstatements of fact, intentionally misleading, or ignored well known facts to advance a false narrative, give the article a D or F (2 or 1).

Reviewers must subscribe to Public Editor and agree to our terms of service to participate. Subscriptions are currently free. We recommend that all readers subscribe to the Boston Globe or the newspaper of their choice to support journalism, and to send the Boston Globe your feedback directly. Thank you for participating in Public Editor’s bias rating project!

Leave A Comment

Subject

Rating: 10.0/10.

Description