The Boston Globe runs a short piece about the Orlando Sentinel’s editorial refusing to endorse President Trump for re-election. His opponent is still unknown, the election isn’t for 18 months still, but I guess that doesn’t matter.
To the Globe, this is evidence of how poor a job President Trump has done, and how wretched a human being he is. I mean, it isn’t often that people can actually vote for someone who is a Nazi, racist, white supremacist, sexist, homophobic, transgender-phobic, xenophobic, runner of concentration camps, and warmonger. Luckily we have newspapers like the Boston Globe and Orlando Sentinel to tell us how to think.
I think the Boston Globe ran this piece because it wished it had thought of this editorial stunt first. I mean, they pioneered the Fake News full-front-page during the campaign that predicted what life would be like under President Trump. Well, at least their professional animus is well documented.
What the Globe doesn’t tell you is about the Orlando Sentinel’s 2016 Presidential endorsement, or it’s recent 2018 statewide endorsements for FL Governor or Senator. But you can guess which party all those candidates came from. If you want to verify, here are the links:
*Requires minimim of 5 Ratings to be displayed
Grading articles for bias is subjective. We hope that with widespread participation, we can give the reporters and editors at the Boston Globe valuable feedback on their professional work. Here are our suggestions for grading news articles for bias. (We do not rate editorial opinion columns for bias. But we do analyze the Boston Globe for overall editorial balance.)
Consider whether the article is completely free of bias (a grade of 10 or A), has been mostly free of bias (8 or 9, A- or B+), has been biased but not terribly or where the bias did not hurt the integrity of the underlying information (7 or 6, B or B-).
If the article was fairly biased overall, but subtle; or where the bias was particularly prominent but isolated to a single section, give the article a 5 or 4 (C+ or C). If the article was very biased but perhaps not intentionally so, perhaps a C- (3) would be deserved.
If the article was extremely prejudiced with major misstatements of fact, intentionally misleading, or ignored well known facts to advance a false narrative, give the article a D or F (2 or 1).
Reviewers must subscribe to Public Editor and agree to our terms of service to participate. Subscriptions are currently free. We recommend that all readers subscribe to the Boston Globe or the newspaper of their choice to support journalism, and to send the Boston Globe your feedback directly. Thank you for participating in Public Editor’s bias rating project!