Protesting the Globe’s coverage of protests

Protesting the Globe’s coverage of protests

PE Bias Grade : C+

By: Allen Nitschelm on April 11, 2019 | Article Review

This is a review of the following Boston Globe Article:
Date 04/11/2019
Article Link N/A
Syndicated From N/A
Journalist N/A
Article Summary

Globe covers another protest.

Share This Story

The Boston Globe feels like it must cover every Left wing protest wherever it occurs. I wonder how many of these protests would happen without the guaranteed media coverage?

In this example, the Globe maligns Chase Bank and a new branch it is opening up in Downtown Crossing. The protesters don’t like Chase’s ties to the “fossil fuel industry.”

I wonder if they are going to protest at every business that opens up anywhere on earth, because they all have ties to the fossil fuel industry.

That the Globe writes this with no commentary on the other side is par for the course, but it is clear bias in coverage, both for covering the non-event itself and failing to explain why the protesters are bonkers.


Author Rating

Rating: 5.0/10.


There are no user ratings at the moment.

Subscriber Ratings & Comments

Please be sure you are logged in to Rate Boston Globe Articles or Post Comments.

Here is the article you are rating for journalistic bias: CLIMATE CHANGE PROTEST

Rating scale in brief: 10 = A (No Bias) | 1 = F (Extreme Bias). For more details, please read Tips & Instructions below.

Please wait...

*Requires minimim of 5 Ratings to be displayed

Leave A Comment

Grading articles for bias is subjective. We hope that with widespread participation, we can give the reporters and editors at the Boston Globe valuable feedback on their professional work. Here are our suggestions for grading news articles for bias. (We do not rate editorial opinion columns for bias. But we do analyze the Boston Globe for overall editorial balance.)

Consider whether the article is completely free of bias (a grade of 10 or A), has been mostly free of bias (8 or 9, A- or B+), has been biased but not terribly or where the bias did not hurt the integrity of the underlying information (7 or 6, B or B-).

If the article was fairly biased overall, but subtle; or where the bias was particularly prominent but isolated to a single section, give the article a 5 or 4 (C+ or C). If the article was very biased but perhaps not intentionally so, perhaps a C- (3) would be deserved.

If the article was extremely prejudiced with major misstatements of fact, intentionally misleading, or ignored well known facts to advance a false narrative, give the article a D or F (2 or 1).

Reviewers must subscribe to Public Editor and agree to our terms of service to participate. Subscriptions are currently free. We recommend that all readers subscribe to the Boston Globe or the newspaper of their choice to support journalism, and to send the Boston Globe your feedback directly. Thank you for participating in Public Editor’s bias rating project!

Leave A Comment


Rating: 5.0/10.


Social Media Auto Publish Powered By :