This article is presented as a round-up of the dozens of Democrats’ reactions to the President. I guess that is fine. There are 20 Democrats, and the President is the President, so he will have to let them battle it out. Today’s article features criticism by Booker and Biden.
The article is mostly balanced, given the constraints outlined above, but near the end, it takes a strange turn. Let me quote directly:
In a biting one-liner that has become a regular jab on the campaign trail, Biden said to applause that Trump had “more in common with George Wallace than he does with George Washington.’’
Ahh, George Wallace was a Democrat. See https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Wallace
That might be the end of my criticism, except that this line evidently is one that Biden uses often, and the audience applauds it. How about we have a front-page article about Joe Biden admitting that Democrats used to be the party of racism and he has proudly worked with segregationists to get things done, and Robert Byrd was a former KKK leader, etc?
*Requires minimim of 5 Ratings to be displayed
Grading articles for bias is subjective. We hope that with widespread participation, we can give the reporters and editors at the Boston Globe valuable feedback on their professional work. Here are our suggestions for grading news articles for bias. (We do not rate editorial opinion columns for bias. But we do analyze the Boston Globe for overall editorial balance.)
Consider whether the article is completely free of bias (a grade of 10 or A), has been mostly free of bias (8 or 9, A- or B+), has been biased but not terribly or where the bias did not hurt the integrity of the underlying information (7 or 6, B or B-).
If the article was fairly biased overall, but subtle; or where the bias was particularly prominent but isolated to a single section, give the article a 5 or 4 (C+ or C). If the article was very biased but perhaps not intentionally so, perhaps a C- (3) would be deserved.
If the article was extremely prejudiced with major misstatements of fact, intentionally misleading, or ignored well known facts to advance a false narrative, give the article a D or F (2 or 1).
Reviewers must subscribe to Public Editor and agree to our terms of service to participate. Subscriptions are currently free. We recommend that all readers subscribe to the Boston Globe or the newspaper of their choice to support journalism, and to send the Boston Globe your feedback directly. Thank you for participating in Public Editor’s bias rating project!