The Boston Globe wrote an article about the Trump campaign rally in Manchester, NH. The article didn’t have a photo of the large crowd (estimated at over 20,000, plus thousands more outside), nor did it mention the crowd in the article itself. The size of the crowd is an indication of President Trump’s popularity, or the commitment of his supporters. Either way, it is a fact that the two reporters covering the event should have reported (if they were trying to be fair, that is.)
There is a biased statement. The reporters claim that Trump contradicted himself on dealing with China and imposing tariffs. “‘I never said China was going to be easy,’ he added, contradicting a statement he made in March 2018 that trade wars ‘are easy to win.'”
Those two statements are not contradictory. A policy may be difficult to implement and even cause pain, but that doesn’t mean that the eventual victory wasn’t easy. Painful perhaps.
But my main criticism of today’s review is a relatively mild one. President Trump has accomplished many things, despite an intrusive witchhunt related to a false accusation of the Trump campaign colluding with Russia. I won’t list his many accomplishments, but Trump has gotten more done than several recent Republican presidents.
And yet he has the time, energy, and skill to campaign like a madman. He was on stage for over an hour, and was pretty entertaining. He demonstrates a vigor that most candidates do not have, and certainly few on the Democrat side possess. He is drawing large crowds, he is extremely popular with his base, and I suspect his general premise that many voters that may not like him really have no choice but to vote to reelect him is true. Who is going to vote for higher taxes, a government takeover of the healthcare industry, a government takeover of the energy industry, open borders, and cancelling trillions of dollars in debt? The Democrats are offering an economic meltdown scenario.
So my criticism is that the headline is poor. Trump isn’t campaigning non-stop. But the way he works the crowds, the media, and his opponents, it must feel like he is…to the Left.
*Requires minimim of 5 Ratings to be displayed
Grading articles for bias is subjective. We hope that with widespread participation, we can give the reporters and editors at the Boston Globe valuable feedback on their professional work. Here are our suggestions for grading news articles for bias. (We do not rate editorial opinion columns for bias. But we do analyze the Boston Globe for overall editorial balance.)
Consider whether the article is completely free of bias (a grade of 10 or A), has been mostly free of bias (8 or 9, A- or B+), has been biased but not terribly or where the bias did not hurt the integrity of the underlying information (7 or 6, B or B-).
If the article was fairly biased overall, but subtle; or where the bias was particularly prominent but isolated to a single section, give the article a 5 or 4 (C+ or C). If the article was very biased but perhaps not intentionally so, perhaps a C- (3) would be deserved.
If the article was extremely prejudiced with major misstatements of fact, intentionally misleading, or ignored well known facts to advance a false narrative, give the article a D or F (2 or 1).
Reviewers must subscribe to Public Editor and agree to our terms of service to participate. Subscriptions are currently free. We recommend that all readers subscribe to the Boston Globe or the newspaper of their choice to support journalism, and to send the Boston Globe your feedback directly. Thank you for participating in Public Editor’s bias rating project!